Both sides, Republican and Democrats, think that their side
is going to win the presidency. There
are logical arguments coming from both sides.
However, some of these arguments come solely from turnout models that no
one seems to think will happen. However, many think Obama will lose. Here is why, and what will happen to the Democratic Party if he does.
Over at Red State, Dan McLaughlin breaks down why he
believes Nate Silvers model is flawed (It is one of the best reads this cycle
when it comes to polling analysis).
Dan writes, “Perhaps,
despite the paucity of evidence to the contrary, these assumptions are wrong. But if they are correct, no mathematical
model can provide a convincing explanation of how Obama is going to win
re-election. He remains toast.”
Silver’s model is about probabilities. Additionally, = he is basing his model off
flawed data—highly improbable turnout models that look like 2008 or better. It seems that McLaughlin’s view that numbers
can only tell you so much is likely correct.
Romney is running strong, evidenced by the 30,000-person rally.
The way the Obama campaign is campaigning is also a telling
sign. The President was speaking about
Romney’s plan and his views on the economy now and in the 1990’s. He said Romney’s name and the audience
started to boo. Obama said “No, no, no -- don’t boo, vote. (Applause.)
Vote! Voting is the best revenge.”
Mitt Romney responds by saying this:
“Yesterday, the
President said something you may have heard by now, that I think surprised a
lot of people," he said Saturday in New Hampshire. "Speaking to an audience, he said voting
is the best revenge. He told his
supporters, voting for ‘revenge.’ Vote for ‘revenge’? Let me tell you what I’d like to tell you:
vote for love of country. It is time we
lead America to a better place.”
Why would the president want to tarnish his name if he did not think had too?
Additionally, Politico is reporting that many people believe
that Obama’s early voting advantages from 2008 have been cut in half. In some places, Romney is even winning. Remember, McCain beat Obama with Election Day
voting, but lost early voting so bad that Obama still won.
Take this with the knowledge that evangelicals are
supporting Romney over Obama this year—to the tune of 70% to 30%, which is a
rough estimate—but it could be enough to offset any advantage Obama may have.
According to Ralph Reed, president of the
Faith and Freedom Coalition, there is going to be huge evangelical advantages
for Romney in Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin.
One example of why this matter is that according to Reed, during the
last election cycle 350,000 evangelicals did not come out to vote in Ohio. If Romney can bring 70% of those people to
his side, he could easily offset the 260,000 margin of victory Obama had over
McCain in 2008. That does not even
include the fact that Obama is not doing nearly as good as he did in 2008. Romney is the one winning independents in
Ohio.
So lets us assume for a second Obama does lose. What is next for the Democratic Party?
President Obama has governed toward the far center
left. He has not been a liberal extremist,
but he has passed policies that make liberals happy. This was a different path than Bill Clinton
attempted to take the party in. Clinton
worked with Republican controlled House to pass welfare reform and balance the
budgets. Clinton’s centrism brought the
Democratic Party back from defeat after Republicans took back the House for the
first time in 50 years. Clinton won
reelection and proved that sitting in the center was the right course for the
Democratic Party.
President Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Harry Reid immediately started
to take the Democratic Party to the left.
They felt that the 2008 election gave them a mandate to take the country
towards a liberal/socialistic utopian dream.
The stimulus and healthcare battles had left the electorate with a sour taste. The 2010 midterms saw another Republican
Revolution roar into power (this time called the Tea Party).
Instead of moving to the center, President Obama has tried
to stay center-left. They actually
believe that the electorate would learn to love those policies by the time the
president was up for reelection. That
did not happen. The next move was to try
to demonize Romney in the hopes that people will forget that the president is
promising more left wing policies—recently they released a brochure full of
past policies Obama supported. It does
not appear to be working, but we will not know for sure until Election Day.
If Obama loses, the Democratic Party will have to rethink itself. The centrist will blame Progressive elements
of the party. Democrats will start
electing moderates that will have a chance to win in a center-right country. If Romney is successful reforming government
and fixing the economy, the abandonment of liberal Democrats will be stronger. The elites in the Democratic Party will recognize
the warning signs. The country is center-right,
a liberal will always find it hard to pass their agenda and win elections. Bill Clinton may have already taught this
lesson by helping Obama in 2012.

I hope you are right about the Democrat Party going moderate. I hope Obama loses 2
ReplyDeleteHey Chuckster, how are you. I equally hope I am correct. In fact, I never hope I am incorrect. ;)
Delete